BMWCCA's strange stance on BMW safety
Groucho Marx supposedly said: I don’t care to belong to any club that will have me as a member.
In renewing my membership in the BMW Car Club of America (BMWCCA), I am reminded of Marx' quip.
I have been participating in High Performance Driver Education (HPDE) over the past summer, but because of the rules, I have not been able to participate in HPDE events sponsored by BMWCCA. And why? Because the BMWCCA deems my car "unsafe" as delivered from the factory.
And what is the exact nature of this safety problem? It isn't a hard top.
The only way that BMWCCA will allow me to participate in driver education events (not racing, mind you) is if I have an aftermarket roll cage installed — never mind my Z4 ragtop roadster comes with BMW factory roll hoops. Understand, this is for a driver education event, not racing.
I raised the issue of aftermarket roll cage requirements on the BMW forums and was promptly told that the death rate in convertible accidents was well documented. Perhaps my search skills aren't what they should be, but I could not find any solid data to locate the said documentation. The data I did find linked injuries to pre-seat belt era cars. The studies went on to suggest that seat belts were the significant factor in auto safety since the 1960s.
On the q.t., I was told by some BMW people that it had something to do with BMWCCA liability insurance.
At the same time, I was able to enter National Auto Sport of America (NASA) and Porsche Club of America (PCA) driver education events on some of the same tracks without being required to add an aftermarket cage in addition to the roll hoops.

After a recent PCA event, I chatted with some of the organizers and asked why Porsche's policy is different in this regard. One individual, an attorney, said that at one time, the PCA also had a similar rule about after-market roll cages, but upon reflection, questioned the insurance company, reasoning that if Porsche was manufacturing and selling a vehicle that was deemed safe, that that should be sufficient. In the end, the insurance company agreed and the Porsche roll cage policy was rolled back.
Interestingly, after I traded in my 2002 BMW 530i for the 2007 BMW 3.0si Z4, the latter with a higher blue book, my insurance premiums actually went down!
So, I find myself at PCA and NASA events, with some awesome instructors and participants — many from the BMW world, but not at BMW events.
The BMWCCA is in the unenviable position that supports a claim the BMW is selling vehicles that are dangerous without after-market modifications. The manufacturer thinks otherwise.
Safety systems in the BMW Z4 Roadster.
A precisely-designed network of suspension, engine management, brakes and tyres, plus Dynamic Stability Control - all with one single objective: to keep the BMW Z4 Roadster safely on track, even in the most demanding situations. The head-thorax airbags are ideally positioned in the seats and are deployed as needed to deliver split-second protection for the vehicle's occupants, should a collision be unavoidable. And the particularly rigid side sills efficiently distribute energy in the case of a side impact.

In closing, I recount an experience at a PCA event at High Plains Raceway (HPR). I was gridding up and an instructor came over and said hello. He was glad to see I had come out again. He reminded me we met at a NASA event at Pueblo, some weeks earlier. How did I like my BMW Z4? Had I come to the BMWCCA event?
I love the Z4. He had not seen me at the BMWCCA driver's education events because of the after-market roll cage rule.
He said it would be a shame to ruin a beautiful vehicle, like the Z4, with a cage.
Indeed, I mused, so now I was wondering if it did not make sense to trade my Z4 in for a Porsche.
"Going over to the dark side," he laugh good naturedly.
Yes, that might be true, but at least I could be part of a club that would have me as a member.
- Zettabyte4's blog
- Log in or register to post comments

Comments
That really does suck. If you read Roundel, you do get the sense that BMWCCA feels superior to BMW, but my guess is that this is just a matter of insurance and not having any desire to address this concern.
Thank you for the comment. I agree on the observation about BMW and the BMWCCA, which for whatever reason — insurance, statistics from the 1950s, or sun spots — has decreed BMWs with factory roll bars are not safe.
I have a long blog in the works that discusses the travails of taking my daily driver and making it ready for HDPE, and the raft of misinformation and comedy of errors that I encountered.
However, what I find annoying about the roll cage issue, and why I am giving it an airing, is an implication that BMW is fobbing off an unsafe car.
If I were BMW, I would consider withdrawing the use of the BMW name and support by an organization that is implying BMW sales literature about safety is not quite true. I am no lawyer, but if I was a BMW executive, I might wish to distance myself from an organization that is using my name and logo to cheapen the safety reputation of the BMW brand.
From what I can see, the statistics are from another era, anecdotal, or contradict (as witnessed by my lower insurance premiums) that BMWs with factory roll bars need aftermarket roll cages to make them safe in non-racing conditions.
My own anecdotal evidence is that my 2007 Z4 roadster insurance premiums are lower than for a 2002 530i with a lower residual.
Also, it puts the rhetoric about "Driver Education" into a different light, because if the insurance company believes the risk of turning a car over on the track is greater than on the street (as per my insurance premium) it makes the "Driver Education" a fiction and that the HDPE events really are "racing," something the event sponsors are quick to point out: that this is driver education and not racing.
By not challenging this, we are agreeing. That is, by accepting the insurance company's limitations, the BWCCA is tacitly agreeing that the insurance people are right — something that the PCA fought and won.